Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Seong Chan Hong vs Zura Tkemaladze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hong vs Tkemaladze analysis and find out who is favored!
Seong Chan Hong vs Zura Tkemaladze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hong has won 53.66% of points on his second serve, while Tkemaladze has won 47.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hong, in recent form, has won 51.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tkemaladze has won 53.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.43% and 33.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hong has saved 63.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tkemaladze has saved 50.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hong has won 50.72% of matches played (W/L 35/ 34), with Tkemaladze winning 50% (W/L 31/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 216/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Tkemaladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 74/ 65), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Hong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 24), where as Tkemaladze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 30/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hong winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hong winning 2 and Tkemaladze winning 1. The last match between Hong and Tkemaladze was at the Nur-Sultan Challenger, 18-07-2022, Q3, Hard with Seong Chan Hong getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hong and Tkemaladze have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hong winning 1 times and Tkemaladze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hong winning 0, and Tkemaladze 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hong has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.87 while Tkemaladze has played against players with an average rank of 108.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hong has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tkemaladze has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hong has converted 41.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tkemaladze has converted 39.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hong 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
198
Rank
172
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
731
Rank
633
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
63% (247-147)
Career Total W/L
47% (104-118)
65% (24-13)
YTD W/L
45% (9-11)
$84,490
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hong VS Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Seong Chan Hong | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:0 | 2:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (43/79) | 55% (54/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (33/43) | 61% (33/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (17/36) | 50% (22/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (43/98) | 37% (29/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Hong VS Tkemaladze H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Seong Chan Hong | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (24/13) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (51/37) | 45% (21/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (434/391) | 46% (194/230) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (24/11) | 53% (9/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:41 | 1:43:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 301.95 | 76.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1580/2571) | 67% (839/1247) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1068/1580) | 60% (504/839) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (534/991) | 49% (199/408) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (117/281) | 40% (56/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1060/2654) | 40% (506/1257) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (22/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (23/36) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (11/15) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 0% (10/0) |
Seong Chan Hong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Blake Ellis
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Moez Echargui
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Seong Chan Hong
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Seong Chan Hong
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Mark Lajal
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Vadym Ursu
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Seydina Andre
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hong Vs Tkemaladze Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Seong Chan Hong
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zura Tkemaladze
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
